Skip to main content

8Factor Report No. 5 · 2026 U.S. Senate election in Alaska (ranked-choice tabulation Nov 18)

Peltola Trails the Count. The Market Has Her at 85%.

Dan Sullivan leads Alaska's first-choice count by under a point with 80,000 ballots still out, and the ranked-choice math leans his way. Kalshi and Polymarket still price Mary Peltola at 84–87%. We graded the market and then tried to break our own call.

November 4, 2026 · Prices as of Nov 4, 2026, ~5:40 AM ET (venue APIs)

Kalshi · Mary Peltola (D) to win86.5¢Trade on Kalshi →
Polymarket · Mary Peltola (D) to win84.45¢Event volume ~$4.7MTrade on Polymarket →

Cross-venue gap 2.049999999999997.0 pts

Predictagon is read-only and not affiliated with any venue. Not financial advice. Check that a venue is legal where you live.

The 8Factor scorecard

Four grades, four ways to break it

1 · CompareC

Venues disagree

A real cross-venue gap — often overstated by quote-type differences.

2 · Fair valueC+

AI fair value band

Model midpoint vs. each venue; bracketing is common when grades are B.

3 · Net edgeB

After fees & buffer

Fees, depth and a safety buffer eat most paper locks.

4 · TimingB+

Fast gap, slow money

Spread may close in days; settlement can lock capital for months.

RED 1

The outstanding vote is Peltola country

The market isn't guessing blind. Traders watching precinct reporting may know that the uncounted ballots come disproportionately from places Peltola wins by 20 or 30 points. If so, a 7–8 point lean in the late vote is the base case, not a stretch, and 85% is fair. **This is the most likely way our analysis is wrong.**

RED 2

Second choices don't break the way we assume

Our transfer split is an assumption. Many Heikes voters may rank nobody else, and if Dan J. Sullivan Jr.'s voters were protest votes rather than confusion votes, they could split evenly or exhaust. If transfers are close to neutral, Sullivan's real final-round edge is under a point, and the late vote only has to lean modestly toward Peltola.

RED 3

The two Dan Sullivans

A second candidate named Dan J. Sullivan is on the ballot. If the final margin is smaller than his vote total, expect legal arguments that the ballot confused voters. That cuts both ways: it adds delay and a real chance that a court, not the count, decides the outcome.

RED 4

The plumbing: resolution and certification

Kalshi resolves on the winning party and Polymarket on the named candidate. Both follow certified results, but a contested certification or court challenge can hold money past November 25, and the venues' delay clauses may not match.

PAPER

No cross-venue arb; directional lean: Sullivan underpriced (fair ~32% vs 13–16¢).

8Factor Report #5: Peltola Trails the Count. The Market Has Her at 85%.

Dan Sullivan leads Alaska's first-choice count by under a point with 80,000 ballots still out, and the ranked-choice math leans his way. Kalshi and Polymarket still price Mary Peltola at 84–87%. We graded the market and then tried to break our own call.

*Predictagon 8Factor Report · No. 5 · November 4, 2026 · Read-only analysis. Not financial advice.*


The market at a glance

KalshiPolymarket
Mary Peltola (D)86¢ bid / 87¢ ask84.1¢ bid / 84.8¢ ask
Dan Sullivan (R)13¢ / 14¢14.4¢ / 16.0¢
Volume~12.7M contracts across both sides; ~5.9M in the last 24h~$4.65M lifetime; ~$1.89M in the last 24h

Trade it on Polymarket → · Trade it on Kalshi →

The 8Factor scorecard

FactorWhat it asksGrade
1 · CompareDo the venues disagree?C
2 · Fair valueWhat's the real probability?C+
3 · Net edgeIs anything tradable after costs?B
4 · TimingWhen does it close, and how long is money stuck?B+
Red teamOutstanding geography · Second choices · Two Sullivans · Resolution4 live risks

Verdict: no arbitrage, but the market looks too sure. The venues sit within about two points of each other, so there is nothing to lock. Against the count and the ranked-choice math, though, 85% looks rich. Our fair value for Peltola is 68%, which makes Sullivan at 14–16¢ the value side. It also makes this the lowest-confidence call in the sprint (see Red 1).


Why this market, why now

Election night settled the big questions. Democrats won control of the Senate and the House, and flipped seats in Ohio, North Carolina, Texas, Iowa and Kansas. Alaska is one of two Senate seats still uncalled, and it now decides the size of the majority, not who holds it.

As of NBC's 6:03 AM ET update, with 72.4% of the expected vote in (about 80,000 ballots remaining):

CandidateFirst-choice share
Dan Sullivan (R, incumbent)48.5%
Mary Peltola (D)47.7%
Gerald Heikes (R)2.2%
Dan J. Sullivan Jr. (independent)~1.7% (election-night reports)

The lead changed hands during the night. Peltola led early, and Sullivan pulled ahead after midnight. Overnight reporting put the gap at about 1,700 votes out of roughly 208,000 counted.

Nobody is above 50%, so Alaska's ranked-choice tabulation decides it on November 18. Mailed ballots postmarked by Election Day are accepted for 10 days (15 from overseas), and certification is targeted for November 25.

So the question is simple: why does a candidate trailing on first choices, in a count where the minor-party second choices lean the other way, trade at 85%?


Factor 1 · Compare: Grade C

Question: do the venues disagree on the same outcome?

Not by much. Kalshi's Democratic contract is 86/87¢ and Polymarket's Peltola contract is 84.1/84.8¢, a gap of about 2 points. One nuance: Kalshi's market resolves on the winning party, while Polymarket's resolves on the named candidate. Here they are the same thing, since Peltola is the only Democrat on the ballot.

There's no venue edge. Both books moved together all night, and both are deep: Polymarket did nearly $1.9 million in 24 hours.


Factor 2 · Fair value: Grade C+

Question: setting the order books aside, what's the real probability Peltola wins after ranked-choice tabulation?

> AI fair value (Peltola): 55% low · 68% mid · 80% high. Confidence: C+.

The ranked-choice math leans Sullivan. Under Alaska's system, last-place candidates are eliminated and their ballots move to each voter's next choice. Two of them matter:

  • Gerald Heikes (2.2%) is a Republican. Assume 80% of his ballots that rank someone go to Sullivan and 10% to Peltola, with the rest exhausted.
  • Dan J. Sullivan Jr. (~1.7%) shares the senator's name. Some of those votes are almost certainly confusion votes from people who meant the senator. Assume a 60/30 split toward Sullivan.
  • On those assumptions, transfers add about 2 points net to Sullivan's lead, on top of his 0.8-point first-choice edge. That's a final-round gap of roughly 2.9 points on the ballots counted so far, about 5,900 votes.

    What Peltola needs from the outstanding vote. With about 80,000 ballots left, she has to win the final-round share of the remaining vote by roughly 54/46. That's a 7- to 8-point lean in a race where the counted vote has her 0.8 points behind on first choices.

    Why that's possible:

  • Geography. Election-night reporting said many of the outstanding precincts are rural communities expected to favor Peltola, who has run strongly in rural and Alaska Native areas before.
  • Late mail. Alaska counts mail for 10 days after Election Day, and late-arriving ballots don't always look like Election Day ballots.
  • Polling. The final New York Times/Siena poll (Oct 23–30) had Peltola at 48 and Sullivan at 46.
  • Why 85% is too sure:

  • A 7–8 point lean in the late vote is a big ask, and the market prices it as close to certain.
  • The ranked-choice transfers are a real structural headwind, not noise.
  • Polls had Peltola slightly ahead, and the counted vote has her slightly behind. That's a small miss, but in her disfavor.
  • Divergence:

    VenueMarket (Peltola)AI midDivergence
    Kalshi86.5¢ (mid)68%−18.5 pts (market too confident)
    Polymarket84.45¢ (mid)68%−16.5 pts

    Flipped around, we put Sullivan at about 32% against a market price of 13–16¢.


    Factor 3 · Net edge: Grade B

    Net Edge = divergence × log10(volume + 1)

  • Polymarket: −16.5 × log10(4.65M) ≈ −16.5 × 6.67 = −110
  • Kalshi: −18.5 × log10(12.7M contracts, used as a volume proxy) ≈ −18.5 × 7.10 = −131
  • The cross-venue lock (per $1 payout):

    StepCents
    Buy Sullivan (R) YES on Kalshi14.0
    Buy Peltola YES on Polymarket84.8
    Total cost98.8
    Gross locked profit+1.2
    Kalshi fee (≈ 0.07 × P × (1−P) at P = 0.14)−0.8
    Polymarket fee (model assumption 2%)−1.7
    Predictagon buffer−1.0
    Net edge≈ −2.3 → PAPER

    There's no arbitrage.

    The directional trade is where the grade comes from. Sullivan at 14–16¢ against a 32% fair value is roughly a 100% expected-value cushion on the stake, and both books are deep enough for normal sizes. It's a B, not an A, because our confidence is only C+: the whole edge rests on transfer assumptions and on what the outstanding ballots look like, and the market may know more about the second than we do.


    Factor 4 · Timing: Grade B+

  • Resolution: ranked-choice tabulation on November 18 (14 days); certification targeted for November 25.
  • Catalysts before then: daily count updates as mail arrives, especially from rural regions; the first-choice margin when counting ends; any litigation over the two Sullivans on the ballot.
  • Convergence: the market will move hard on each count update. If Sullivan's first-choice lead holds above about one point after rural ballots arrive, the price should fall quickly.
  • Short clock and frequent updates, but resolution could slip if the count is challenged: B+.


    The Red Team: four ways this call breaks

    Our call is "the market is about 17 points too confident in Peltola." Here's how that's wrong.

    Red 1 · The outstanding vote is Peltola country

    The market isn't guessing blind. Traders watching precinct reporting may know that the uncounted ballots come disproportionately from places Peltola wins by 20 or 30 points. If so, a 7–8 point lean in the late vote is the base case, not a stretch, and 85% is fair. This is the most likely way our analysis is wrong.

    Watch: which regions report in the next count updates, and Peltola's first-choice share in them.

    Red 2 · Second choices don't break the way we assume

    Our transfer split is an assumption. Many Heikes voters may rank nobody else, and if Dan J. Sullivan Jr.'s voters were protest votes rather than confusion votes, they could split evenly or exhaust. If transfers are close to neutral, Sullivan's real final-round edge is under a point, and the late vote only has to lean modestly toward Peltola.

    Watch: the November 18 round-by-round tabulation, and any exit data on how minor-candidate voters ranked.

    Red 3 · The two Dan Sullivans

    A second candidate named Dan J. Sullivan is on the ballot. If the final margin is smaller than his vote total, expect legal arguments that the ballot confused voters. That cuts both ways: it adds delay and a real chance that a court, not the count, decides the outcome.

    Watch: any lawsuit over the ballot listing, and the size of Dan J. Sullivan Jr.'s final total compared with the margin.

    Red 4 · The plumbing: resolution and certification

    Kalshi resolves on the winning party and Polymarket on the named candidate. Both follow certified results, but a contested certification or court challenge can hold money past November 25, and the venues' delay clauses may not match.

    Watch: each venue's resolution source and deadline language before trading.


    Bottom line

    Cross-venue signalPAPER (venues within ~2 pts)
    Directional viewSullivan underpriced: fair ~32% vs market 13–16¢
    AI fair value (Peltola)68% (band 55–80%)
    Clock14 days to tabulation (Nov 18), certification Nov 25
    Biggest riskRed 1: the outstanding ballots are heavily pro-Peltola

    The market reads the outstanding vote as decisive for Peltola. It may be right, since rural Alaska has carried her before. But she trails on first choices, the ranked-choice transfers lean the other way, and a 7–8 point lean in the late vote is a lot to price at 85%. If the next count updates show rural ballots closing the gap fast, we'll re-grade and move toward the market.

    New 8Factor Reports publish every week at Predictagon.com/8Factor.


    Data notes and methodology

  • Prices: Kalshi public API (`SENATEAK-26`) and Polymarket Gamma API (`alaska-senate-election-winner`), November 4, 2026, ~5:40 AM ET. Kalshi volume is reported in contracts and used as a volume proxy. Prices move constantly; the live widget shows current prices.
  • Count: NBC News results page, updated 6:03 AM ET (Sullivan 48.5%, Peltola 47.7%, Heikes 2.2%; 72.4% expected vote in; ~80,000 remaining). Dan J. Sullivan Jr.'s ~1.7% is from election-night reporting.
  • Ranked-choice timing: tabulation November 18; mail accepted 10 days (15 from overseas); certification target November 25.
  • Transfer assumptions: Heikes 80/10 Sullivan/Peltola; Dan J. Sullivan Jr. 60/30; the rest exhausted. These are model assumptions, not data.
  • Settled seed: Democratic Senate and House control, and Democratic Senate wins in OH, NC, TX, IA, KS and MN, settled on Predictagon's Top 5 Picks board from NBC and CBS projections.
  • Fees: Kalshi approximated with its published formula; Polymarket uses Predictagon's 2% model assumption.
  • Predictagon is read-only, politically neutral and not affiliated with any venue. This is market analysis, not an endorsement and not financial advice.
  • Sources: NBC News: Alaska Senate results · Alaska Beacon: Senate race a tossup as more votes are counted · Alaska Public Media: Sullivan and Peltola locked in tight race · CBS News: How ranked choice works with two Dan Sullivans on the ballot · Polymarket: Alaska Senate Election Winner

    Keep reading on Predictagon

    Related markets, topics, and hubs on this site.

    Sources: NBC News: Alaska Senate results · Alaska Beacon: Senate race a tossup as more votes are counted · Alaska Public Media: Sullivan and Peltola locked in tight race · CBS News: How ranked choice works with two Dan Sullivans on the ballot · Polymarket: Alaska Senate Election Winner